EB-1 Sustained Acclaim Explained: Why Meeting 3 Criteria Is NOT Enough for Approval

Many professionals believe the EB-1A extraordinary ability green card works like a checklist:

“Meet 3 criteria → get approved.”

Unfortunately, that assumption leads to many denials.

Every year, highly accomplished scientists, executives, artists, engineers, and entrepreneurs receive Requests for Evidence (RFEs) or EB-1 denials — even though they clearly qualify under multiple EB-1 criteria.

Why?

Because EB-1 approval requires more than satisfying three regulatory boxes.

You must also prove something deeper:

Sustained national or international acclaim

And this is exactly where most EB-1 cases fail.

In this guide, we explain:

• what EB-1 sustained acclaim really means
  
  
• why meeting 3 criteria is not enough
  
  
• how USCIS evaluates “final merits”
  
  
• common denial reasons
  
  
• the 2026 Mukherji v. Miller legal precedent
  
  
• and how to structure a stronger petition
  
  

What Is “Sustained Acclaim” in EB-1?

Under the EB-1A Extraordinary Ability category, USCIS requires proof that the applicant has:

sustained national or international acclaim and achievements recognized in the field.

This means your recognition must be:

✅ long-term
✅ ongoing
✅ independently validated
✅ visible beyond your employer

Not:

❌ one-time success
❌ short bursts of attention
❌ outdated accomplishments
❌ local reputation only

USCIS is not asking:

“Were you successful once?”

They are asking:

👉 “Have you consistently remained at the top of your field over time?”

Important: Meeting 3 Criteria Is NOT Enough

This is one of the biggest misconceptions about the EB-1 visa.

Many applicants believe:

“If I satisfy at least three EB-1 criteria, approval is automatic.”

This is incorrect.

Every EB-1 applicant must prove BOTH:

• Qualification under at least three regulatory criteria
AND
• Sustained national or international acclaim

Even if you meet 3, 4, or 5 criteria, USCIS can still deny your petition if they believe you have not demonstrated sustained acclaim.

This second step is called the:

Final Merits Determination

And it is where many strong cases fail.

How USCIS Actually Evaluates EB-1 Cases (Two-Step Analysis)

USCIS follows a two-step process:

Step 1 — Criteria Test

Do you meet at least 3 categories?

• awards
  
  
• media
  
  
• judging
  
  
• publications
  
  
• leadership
  
  
• high salary
  
  
• etc.
  
  

Step 2 — Final Merits (Sustained Acclaim)

Does the TOTAL evidence prove long-term extraordinary recognition?

Step 2 is subjective and holistic.

This means:
USCIS looks at the overall story, not just documents.

And this is where strategy matters most.

Why Many EB-1 Petitions Get Denied on Sustained Acclaim

In practice, we see repeated patterns in denials.

Common weaknesses include:

❌ one award only
❌ one press article
❌ achievements only from years ago
❌ no recent activity
❌ evidence concentrated in one year
❌ employer letters only (no independent proof)
❌ local recognition presented as national

Remember:

Strong career ≠ strong case

USCIS wants:
👉 consistency over time

How USCIS Measures “Sustained”

Think in years, not moments.

Weak profile

2019 → award
Nothing after

Strong profile

2019 → award
2020 → media
2021 → judging
2022 → leadership
2023 → publication
2024 → new recognition

The second profile clearly demonstrates:

👉 sustained acclaim

This timeline logic is extremely important.

What Evidence Best Proves Sustained Acclaim?

The strongest EB-1 extraordinary ability petitions show BOTH:

✔ diversity of evidence
✔ continuity over years

Here are the most persuasive categories:

Media Coverage

• national/international press
  
• major publications
  
• interviews
  
• independent features
  

Tip: multiple years > multiple articles in one month

Awards & Honors

• prestigious prizes
  
• selective recognitions
  
• competitive distinctions
  
• recurring awards
  

Tip: repeat recognition shows sustained impact

Judging the Work of Others

• peer review
  
• jury membership
  
• grant review panels
  
• conference committees
  

Tip: shows the field views you as an expert

Publications & Contributions

• scholarly articles
  
• citations
  
• patents
  
• major projects
  
• industry innovations
  

Tip: continued production proves long-term excellence

Leadership Roles

• executive positions
  
• founders
  
• senior decision makers
  
• project leaders
  

Tip: influence over time matters

High Salary or Compensation

• above market pay
  
• premium consulting
  
• elite contracts
  

Tip: the market recognizes your value

Recent Legal Update: Mukherji v. Miller (2026)

A significant 2026 court decision reinforced how EB-1 sustained acclaim must be evaluated.

In Mukherji v. Miller, a federal court reviewed an EB-1A denial where USCIS claimed the applicant did not demonstrate sufficient sustained acclaim — despite meeting multiple criteria.

The court questioned whether USCIS:

• applied the standard too narrowly
  
• discounted strong evidence
  
• relied on subjective interpretation
  

The ruling emphasized:

USCIS must evaluate the TOTALITY of evidence — not dismiss cases arbitrarily.

Why this case matters

This decision sends two clear messages:

1. For applicants

Meeting criteria alone isn’t enough — build a strong sustained acclaim record.

2. For USCIS

Officers cannot unfairly minimize strong, consistent achievements.

Courts are increasingly reviewing improper EB-1 denials.

This highlights the importance of:

• strategic presentation
  
• organized evidence
  
• legal argumentation
  
• and experienced representation
  

Strategy: How to Build a Strong EB-1 Sustained Acclaim Case

If you’re planning an EB-1 petition, think long-term.

Practical roadmap

Step 1 — Spread achievements across years

Avoid clustering evidence.

Step 2 — Diversify categories

Combine awards + media + leadership + judging + publications.

Step 3 — Show recent success

Last 1–2 years matter heavily.

Step 4 — Add independent proof

Third-party recognition > self-generated materials.

Step 5 — Tell a clear story

Make it obvious that you have remained at the top.

EB-1 Is Legal Strategy — Not Just Documents

Two candidates can have identical resumes.

One gets denied.
The other gets approved.

The difference is usually:

👉 how the case is structured and argued.

EB-1 success depends on:

• legal framing
  
  
• narrative
  
  
• organization
  
  
• credibility
  
  
• strategy
  
  

Not just credentials.

EB-1 Sustained Acclaim – FAQ

Is meeting 3 criteria enough for EB-1?

No. Sustained acclaim must also be proven.

What does sustained acclaim mean?

Long-term, continuous national or international recognition.

How many years of evidence do I need?

There’s no fixed number, but multiple years are expected.

Are recent achievements important?

Yes. Current recognition significantly strengthens your case.

Can USCIS deny even if I meet 3 criteria?

Yes. This happens frequently during the final merits review.

Thinking About an EB-1 Extraordinary Ability Petition?

The real question is not:

“Am I talented enough?”

It’s:

👉 “Can I prove sustained acclaim the way USCIS expects?”

Strategic preparation early can dramatically improve approval chances.

Consulting with an experienced immigration attorney can help you identify gaps, strengthen evidence, and avoid common pitfalls.